International orthodontics · 2020
Comparison of treatment outcomes with crowned and banded mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in Class II pubertal subjects: A retrospective cohort study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Jewair Thikriat, Ghorbaniparvar Mohammadreza, Franchi Lorenzo, Flores-Mir Carlos
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in Angle Class II malocclusion subjects treated with the banded Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (Ba-MARA) and crowned MARA (Cr-MARA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 40 consecutively treated pubertal adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion who received full-fixed orthodontic appliances with a phase of orthopedic treatment using Ba-MARA (n=20) or Cr-MARA (n=20). The samples were compared with 20 untreated Class II controls obtained from the Michigan Growth Study. Lateral cephalograms were obtained pre-treatment (T1), post-MARA removal (T2), and post-full-fixed orthodontic treatment (T3).
RESULTS: After MARA removal (T2-T1), the total mandibular length increased only in the Cr-MARA group compared to controls (Co-Gn=5.4mm; post-hoc P=0.042). Overall dentoskeletal changes were less significant during the T3-T2 timepoint. After full-fixed orthodontic treatment (T3-T1), and after controlling for normal growth, both Ba- and Cr-MARA groups increased the total mandibular length by 3.1mm and 3.8mm respectively. Overjet decreased by 2.2mm in Ba-MARA and 2.9mm in Cr-MARA. The mandibular molars erupted and moved mesially in both treatment groups. The mandibular incisors proclined significantly in the Cr-MARA group in comparison to controls (IMPA=7.1o, post-hoc P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Both MARA designs were effective in correcting the malocclusion by a combination of small skeletal and dental changes. Although significant differences in dentoskeletal outcomes were observed between the MARA groups and the controls, the differences between the two MARA designs were small and did not achieve statistical/clinical significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 40 consecutively treated pubertal adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion who received full-fixed orthodontic appliances with a phase of orthopedic treatment using Ba-MARA (n=20) or Cr-MARA (n=20). The samples were compared with 20 untreated Class II controls obtained from the Michigan Growth Study. Lateral cephalograms were obtained pre-treatment (T1), post-MARA removal (T2), and post-full-fixed orthodontic treatment (T3).
RESULTS: After MARA removal (T2-T1), the total mandibular length increased only in the Cr-MARA group compared to controls (Co-Gn=5.4mm; post-hoc P=0.042). Overall dentoskeletal changes were less significant during the T3-T2 timepoint. After full-fixed orthodontic treatment (T3-T1), and after controlling for normal growth, both Ba- and Cr-MARA groups increased the total mandibular length by 3.1mm and 3.8mm respectively. Overjet decreased by 2.2mm in Ba-MARA and 2.9mm in Cr-MARA. The mandibular molars erupted and moved mesially in both treatment groups. The mandibular incisors proclined significantly in the Cr-MARA group in comparison to controls (IMPA=7.1o, post-hoc P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Both MARA designs were effective in correcting the malocclusion by a combination of small skeletal and dental changes. Although significant differences in dentoskeletal outcomes were observed between the MARA groups and the controls, the differences between the two MARA designs were small and did not achieve statistical/clinical significance.