MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1179/2151090314y.0000000038

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2016

Quantitative measurements of the articular areas of mandibular condyles with temporomandibular joint disorders using magnetic resonance imaging.

Kohi Kaori, Igarashi Chinami, Sugisaki Masashi, Osano Takashi, Sato Yohei, Kobayashi Kaoru, Ohkubo Chikahiro

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to clarify the variation in the condylar anterior functional surface (AFS) of patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders using quantitative measurements by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

MR images of 68 joints (2 males, 32 females) were used. The subjects were classified into three groups: with/without defects of cortical bone groups and a combination group without defects. The AFS was measured as the length between the protrusive point and the apex of the condyle on MRI (4-mm-thick slices), and the quad value of the length was defined as the area on the slice. The summed quad values of all slices were used as the AFS area. Differences in the areas among the three groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

The non-defect group had significantly larger AFS areas than the defect group.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative measurement on MR images clarified the changes in the condylar sagittal appearance.

Для цитирования: Kohi Kaori, Igarashi Chinami, Sugisaki Masashi, Osano Takashi, Sato Yohei, Kobayashi Kaoru, Ohkubo Chikahiro. Quantitative measurements of the articular areas of mandibular condyles with temporomandibular joint disorders using magnetic resonance imaging.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2016. DOI: 10.1179/2151090314y.0000000038.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.