Jaw clenching effects in relation to two extreme occlusal features: patterns of diagnoses in a TMD patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this investigation was to compare the pattern of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) diagnoses in clenching patients with different occlusal features, the null hypothesis being that no between-group differences exist.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Two groups of subjects receiving a jaw clenching diagnosis and having large overjet or anterior open bite (Group A; N=45, 75.5% females, mean age: 38.1 +/- 15.9 years) or normal occlusion (Group B; N=69, 71% females, mean age: 34.6 +/- 13.8 years) were recruited among a TMD patient population and were given Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) axis I diagnoses, namely, group I muscle disorders, group II disc displacements, and group III arthralgia/osteoarthritis/osteoarthrosis.

MAJOR FINDINGS: The distribution of RDC/TMD single and combined group diagnoses was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05), with Group A subjects showing a higher prevalence of multiple diagnoses (60% versus 43.3%), as well as a higher prevalence of combined RDC/TMD axis I group II and III diagnoses (37.8% versus 20.2%). All TMD signs and symptoms were more frequent in the patients with large overjet or anterior open bite with respect to the patients with normal occlusion.

CONCLUSION

In a TMD patient population, jaw clenching may have different consequences in subjects with large overjet or anterior open bite with respect to subjects featuring normal occlusion.