MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00386

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in women's health · 2022

Epithelioid leiomyoma of the uterus: A case report with magnetic resonance imaging findings.

Kita Ayaka, Maeda Tetsuo, Kitajima Kazuhiro, Murakoshi Homare, Watanabe Takahiro, Inagaki Mieko, Yoshida Shigeki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Epithelioid leiomyoma of the uterus is rare, and its prognostic factors have not been well established. Moreover, radiologic findings of this disease have not been previously documented. This is a case of a 49-year-old woman with epithelioid leiomyoma of the uterus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a heterogeneous high-intensity mass with multiple ordinary uterine leiomyomas. The mass showed a slightly diffusion-restricted site. Since benign tumors could not be confidently diagnosed using these MRI findings, total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed, and a pathological diagnosis of epithelioid leiomyoma of the uterus was established. Microscopically, this lesion showed edematous changes and cyst formation, causing a heterogeneous appearance on T2-weighted images. In addition, the diffusion-restricted site is considered to be consistent with areas of solid and dense proliferation of tumor cells. The patient survived and was well 10 months after the surgery. It is important to recognize this benign variant of leiomyoma with an unusual appearance, to provide appropriate therapeutic management.

Для цитирования: Kita Ayaka, Maeda Tetsuo, Kitajima Kazuhiro, Murakoshi Homare, Watanabe Takahiro, Inagaki Mieko, Yoshida Shigeki. Epithelioid leiomyoma of the uterus: A case report with magnetic resonance imaging findings.. Case reports in women's health. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00386.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.