MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.02.064

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology case reports · 2021

Patient with penile metastasis from prostate cancer and survival over 5 years: A case report with longitudinal evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Fujita Nana, Kurokawa Ryo, Kaneshima Risa, Machida Munetaka, Kawai Go, Wada Tomoki, Takahashi Masamichi, Nakaya Moto, Sakamoto Naoya, Cho Shinichi, Abe Osamu, Matsuoka Yujiro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Penile metastasis of malignant tumors is a very rare condition, often occurring as a part of systemic metastases, and is therefore associated with a poor prognosis. Although there have been reports of magnetic resonance imaging findings of penile metastasis, longitudinal imaging changes have not been presented previously. We report a case of a 80-year-old male patient with penile metastasis from prostate adenocarcinoma. First magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated multiple penile nodules in the left corpus cavernosum corpora cavernosa, and these nodules were fused and across the septum of the penis, forming an enlarged, diffusely spreading mass on the follow-up exam 5 years later. In this case, a longitudinal evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated the course of the extension of the rare penile metastasis.

Для цитирования: Fujita Nana, Kurokawa Ryo, Kaneshima Risa, Machida Munetaka, Kawai Go, Wada Tomoki, Takahashi Masamichi, Nakaya Moto, Sakamoto Naoya, Cho Shinichi, Abe Osamu, Matsuoka Yujiro. Patient with penile metastasis from prostate cancer and survival over 5 years: A case report with longitudinal evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.. Radiology case reports. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.02.064.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.