MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000264

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of gastroenterology · 2019

Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality: Development of Quality Indicators for Acute Pancreatitis Management.

Vivian Elaina, Cler Leslie, Conwell Darwin, Coté Gregory A, Dickerman Richard, Freeman Martin, Gardner Timothy B, Hawes Robert H, Kedia Prashant, Krishnamoorthi Rajesh, Oduor Hellen, Pandol Stephen J, Papachristou Georgios I, Ross Andrew, Sethi Amrita, Varadarajulu Shyam, Vege Santhi Swaroop, Wassef Wahid, Wilcox C Mel, Whitcomb David C, Wu Bechien U, Yadav Dhiraj, Ellison Ashton, Habash Samar, Rastegari Sheila, Reddy Rathan, Yen Timothy, Brooks Mary Rachel, Tarnasky Paul

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Detailed recommendations and guidelines for acute pancreatitis (AP) management currently exist. However, quality indicators (QIs) are required to measure performance in health care. The goal of the Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality was to formally develop QIs for the management of patients with known or suspected AP using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel composed of physicians (gastroenterologists, hospitalists, and surgeons) who are acknowledged leaders in their specialties and who represent geographic and practice setting diversity was convened. A literature review was conducted, and a list of proposed QIs was developed. In 3 rounds, panelists reviewed literature, modified QIs, and rated them on the basis of scientific evidence, bias, interpretability, validity, necessity, and proposed performance targets.

RESULTS

Supporting literature and a list of 71 proposed QIs across 10 AP domains (Diagnosis, Etiology, Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification, etc.) were sent to the expert panel to review and independently rate in round 1 (95% of panelists participated). Based on a round 2 face-to-face discussion of QIs (75% participation), 41 QIs were classified as valid. During round 3 (90% participation), panelists rated the 41 valid QIs for necessity and proposed performance thresholds. The final classification determined that 40 QIs were both valid and necessary.

DISCUSSION: Hospitals and providers managing patients with known or suspected AP should ensure that patients receive high-quality care and desired outcomes according to current evidence-based best practices. This physician-led initiative formally developed 40 QIs and performance threshold targets for AP management. Validated QIs provide a dependable quantitative framework for health systems to monitor the quality of care provided to patients with known or suspected AP.

Для цитирования: Vivian Elaina, Cler Leslie, Conwell Darwin, Coté Gregory A, Dickerman Richard, Freeman Martin, Gardner Timothy B, Hawes Robert H, Kedia Prashant, Krishnamoorthi Rajesh, Oduor Hellen, Pandol Stephen J, Papachristou Georgios I, Ross Andrew, Sethi Amrita, Varadarajulu Shyam, Vege Santhi Swaroop, Wassef Wahid, Wilcox C Mel, Whitcomb David C, Wu Bechien U, Yadav Dhiraj, Ellison Ashton, Habash Samar, Rastegari Sheila, Reddy Rathan, Yen Timothy, Brooks Mary Rachel, Tarnasky Paul. Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality: Development of Quality Indicators for Acute Pancreatitis Management.. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2019. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000264.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.