Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2020
Validation of a novel strabismus surgery 3D-printed silicone eye model for simulation training.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jagan Lisa, Turk William, Petropolis Christian, Egan Rylan, Cofie Nicholas, Wright Kenneth W, Strube Yi Ning J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the validity of a new 3D-printed silicone model for practicing strabismus surgery, compared with the rabbit head, in terms of simulator fidelity.
METHODS: In this multicenter study, a validated questionnaire was developed to assess fidelity of the model and rabbit head. Participants were asked to rate overall globe, conjunctiva, muscle, and scleral fidelity using a 5-point scale. The survey instrument was disseminated at three strabismus instruction courses: at two meetings, participants practiced on the model and rabbit head prior to completing the questionnaire; at the third, instructors demonstrated advanced surgical skills using only the model and then completed the questionnaire. Repeated measures analysis of variance compared ratings. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation evaluated correlation between years of experience to participants' responses. Qualitative data were coded into themes.
RESULTS: A total of 47 participants completed the questionnaire. The model rated 18% higher than rabbit head for anatomical accuracy (mean difference, 0.667; P = 0.001) and 25% higher for position of eyes within the head (mean difference, 0.867; P = 0.006). More experienced participants were more likely to strongly agree that the silicone conjunctiva effectively mimics real conjunctiva (ρ = 0.337; P = 0.036) and that scleral tissue effectively mimics real sclera (ρ = 0.298, P = 0.042). Qualitative data supported the model.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the validity of the surgical model in terms of fidelity compared to the rabbit head.
METHODS: In this multicenter study, a validated questionnaire was developed to assess fidelity of the model and rabbit head. Participants were asked to rate overall globe, conjunctiva, muscle, and scleral fidelity using a 5-point scale. The survey instrument was disseminated at three strabismus instruction courses: at two meetings, participants practiced on the model and rabbit head prior to completing the questionnaire; at the third, instructors demonstrated advanced surgical skills using only the model and then completed the questionnaire. Repeated measures analysis of variance compared ratings. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation evaluated correlation between years of experience to participants' responses. Qualitative data were coded into themes.
RESULTS: A total of 47 participants completed the questionnaire. The model rated 18% higher than rabbit head for anatomical accuracy (mean difference, 0.667; P = 0.001) and 25% higher for position of eyes within the head (mean difference, 0.867; P = 0.006). More experienced participants were more likely to strongly agree that the silicone conjunctiva effectively mimics real conjunctiva (ρ = 0.337; P = 0.036) and that scleral tissue effectively mimics real sclera (ρ = 0.298, P = 0.042). Qualitative data supported the model.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the validity of the surgical model in terms of fidelity compared to the rabbit head.