DOI 10.1007/s10792-024-03398-x
Identifying the greatest surgeon-perceived barriers and challenges in performing corneal transplantation in India.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
There is currently no systematic method of assessing limitations in performing corneal transplantation. The purpose of the study was to identify the limitations of performing corneal transplantation in India.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey study.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 148 members of the Cornea Society of India.
METHODS
A survey tool was developed to identify region-specific barriers to performing corneal transplantation. The survey was edited by a marketing firm and reviewed and approved by 4 of the participating corneal surgeons in India. The electronic survey was distributed nationwide to members of the Cornea Society of India between January 1, 2021 and July 1, 2021. Participants were asked to rate the difficulty or ease of 11 predetermined steps/variables of the corneal transplantation process using a Likert scale.
RESULTS
One hundred forty-eight practicing cornea surgeons participated in the survey (21% response rate). The most common barrier was difficulty with finding donors who fulfilled the screening criteria for transplantation (55%). The second most common barrier was patient/family willingness to donate organs (32%). The third most common barrier was the inability to store tissue after it was prepared by the eye bank (20%). The two variables least commonly identified as barriers were operating room staff availability and using the donor tissue before expiration.
CONCLUSION
The greatest barrier to corneal transplantation in India was finding donors who fulfilled screening criteria. Additional studies into the contributing factors are underway to inform governing bodies on resource allocation to enhance procurement of quality donor tissues.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.