MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.64898/2026.07.07.26357463

Медицинская библиотека · medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026

A study of sex-specific genetic effects underlying risk of orofacial clefts also highlights the potential impact of sequencing errors due to short read mis-mapping.

Kanchan Kanika, Erdogan-Yildirim Zeynep, Berke Seth, Mukhopadhyay Nandita, Ray Debashree, Simpson Claire L, Bidinger Jacqueline A, Curtis Sarah W, Butali Azeez, Schwender Holger, Scott Alan F, Bailey-Wilson Joan E, Beaty Terri H, Leslie-Clarkson Elizabeth, Marazita Mary L, Ruczinski Ingo

СтатьяПрепринтПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Orofacial clefts (OFCs), including cleft lip (CL), cleft palate (CP), and cleft lip with cleft palate (CLP), are among the most common craniofacial malformations in humans, with a birth prevalence of approximately 1 in 1,000 live births globally. Non-syndromic forms of OFC are predominantly genetic, with significant variability in prevalence across populations. Understanding the genetic underpinnings of OFCs remains a key public health priority, given the substantial medical and societal burden of these conditions. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated numerous genetic loci, but challenges remain due to genetic heterogeneity and complex gene-environment interactions. This study aimed to identify sex-specific genetic risk factors for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) through a meta-analysis of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from 1,922 case-parent trios across eight diverse cohorts. Our approach revealed four SNPs in three distinct regions that showed genome-wide significant sex-specific effects. However, despite each of these SNPs passing standard quality control filters, follow-up analyses showed that these signals most likely were technical artifacts caused by sequencing errors, in particular mis-mapped reads due to sequence similarities with the sex chromo-somes. These findings highlight the necessity for careful scrutiny when studying differences between the sexes in genetic association studies.

Для цитирования: Kanchan Kanika, Erdogan-Yildirim Zeynep, Berke Seth, Mukhopadhyay Nandita, Ray Debashree, Simpson Claire L, Bidinger Jacqueline A, Curtis Sarah W, Butali Azeez, Schwender Holger, Scott Alan F, Bailey-Wilson Joan E, Beaty Terri H, Leslie-Clarkson Elizabeth, Marazita Mary L, Ruczinski Ingo. A study of sex-specific genetic effects underlying risk of orofacial clefts also highlights the potential impact of sequencing errors due to short read mis-mapping.. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. 2026. DOI: 10.64898/2026.07.07.26357463.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.