MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/014556131709600320

Медицинская библиотека · Ear, nose, & throat journal · 2017

Submandibular salivary gland tumors: Clinical course and outcome of a 20-year multicenter study.

Mizrachi Aviram, Bachar Gideon, Unger Yaron, Hilly Ohad, Fliss Dan M, Shpitzer Thomas

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this retrospective chart review study was to review the nature and clinical course of benign and malignant submandibular gland tumors at 2 major university-affiliated tertiary medical centers. All patients who underwent submandibular salivary gland excision between 1990 and 2010 were included. Clinical and disease-related data were collected from the medical charts. One hundred ninety-three patients were identified, of whom 108 (56%) had non-neoplastic disorders (sialolithiasis and sialadenitis). The remaining 85 patients (44%) had a submandibular salivary gland tumor. The most common benign neoplasm was pleomorphic adenoma (53 patients). Twenty tumors (24%) were malignant: adenoid cystic carcinoma in 11 patients, mucoepidermoid carcinoma in 6 patients, and adenocarcinoma in 3 patients. Recurrence was noted in 7 patients with submandibular gland malignancy and in 2 patients with pleomorphic adenoma. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 63%. Tumors of the submandibular gland are infrequently malignant. Recurrent submandibular salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma is rare compared with recurrences in the parotid gland.

Для цитирования: Mizrachi Aviram, Bachar Gideon, Unger Yaron, Hilly Ohad, Fliss Dan M, Shpitzer Thomas. Submandibular salivary gland tumors: Clinical course and outcome of a 20-year multicenter study.. Ear, nose, & throat journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/014556131709600320.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.