Clinical oral investigations · 2023
Treatment outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures in nonvital mature permanent teeth: a retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Jing, Kahler Bill, Jiang Xing, Lu Zhaojie, Lu Youguang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study was undertaken to clinically and radiographically evaluate the long-term outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) for nonvital mature permanent teeth, to analyze predictors influencing treatment outcomes.
METHODS: Nonvital mature permanent teeth treated by REPs with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months were included from 2015 to 2017. Treatment outcomes were categorized as success and failure. The periapical status and lesion healing were assessed in terms of the periapical index (PAI) and the percentage changes in periapical radiolucency (PARL) area. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of REPs were assessed by Mann-Whitney test at different follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier curves and Univariate Cox regression analysis were conducted to assess the success and identify potential predictors affecting outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 37 mature teeth with an average follow-up of 4.3 years satisfied the criteria, and 89.2% of the teeth had a successful outcome. Significant differences in PAI scores were found between each period with respect to the baseline (p < .05). Among different periods, there was a significant difference between intervals of 3-6 months and 7-12 months (p = .039) and no significant difference between each interval of more than 12 months (p > .05). Eighty-seven percent of teeth with preoperative PARL presented completely healed. REPs significantly decreased the PARL area at the interval of 7-12 months compared to 3-6 months (p = .025), with no significant difference between each interval of more than 12 months (p > .05). No significant predictor was found for the success of outcome (p > .05). Thirteen teeth (35.1%) regained pulp sensibility, and 40.5% of the teeth exhibited intracanal calcification.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, REPs provided a high long-term success rate and promoted the resolution of PARL as a biologically-based alternative treatment option for nonvital mature teeth.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: REPs provide a high long-term success rate and promoted healing of apical periodontitis comparable with reported outcomes for root canal therapy of mature teeth.
METHODS: Nonvital mature permanent teeth treated by REPs with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months were included from 2015 to 2017. Treatment outcomes were categorized as success and failure. The periapical status and lesion healing were assessed in terms of the periapical index (PAI) and the percentage changes in periapical radiolucency (PARL) area. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of REPs were assessed by Mann-Whitney test at different follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier curves and Univariate Cox regression analysis were conducted to assess the success and identify potential predictors affecting outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 37 mature teeth with an average follow-up of 4.3 years satisfied the criteria, and 89.2% of the teeth had a successful outcome. Significant differences in PAI scores were found between each period with respect to the baseline (p < .05). Among different periods, there was a significant difference between intervals of 3-6 months and 7-12 months (p = .039) and no significant difference between each interval of more than 12 months (p > .05). Eighty-seven percent of teeth with preoperative PARL presented completely healed. REPs significantly decreased the PARL area at the interval of 7-12 months compared to 3-6 months (p = .025), with no significant difference between each interval of more than 12 months (p > .05). No significant predictor was found for the success of outcome (p > .05). Thirteen teeth (35.1%) regained pulp sensibility, and 40.5% of the teeth exhibited intracanal calcification.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, REPs provided a high long-term success rate and promoted the resolution of PARL as a biologically-based alternative treatment option for nonvital mature teeth.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: REPs provide a high long-term success rate and promoted healing of apical periodontitis comparable with reported outcomes for root canal therapy of mature teeth.