MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11607/ijp.8565

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of prosthodontics · 2024

Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions.

Azevedo Luís, Marques Tiago, Karasan Duygu, Fehmer Vincent, Sailer Irena, Correia André, Gómez Polo Miguel

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions using different intraoral scan body (ISB) materials and intraoral scanners (IOSs).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The mandibular dental cast of an edentulous patient with six tissue-level dental implants was used as the master cast. Two types of ISBs-polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and plasma-coated medical titanium-were used with five IOSs: TRIOS 4 (T4), Virtuo Vivo (VV), Medit i700 (Mi700), iTero 5D (i5D), and Primescan (PS). To assess accuracy, digital impressions (n &#61; 10) with each IOS and ISB were compared to two reference models obtained by digitizing the master cast with each ISB type using a desktop scanner (IScan4D LS3i) and importing the scan data into metrology software (Geomagic Control X). Root mean square (RMS) error was employed to evaluate overall deviation values (trueness), while precision was determined using the SD of RMS values. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed by the pairwise comparison method with Bonferroni correction (α &#61; .05).

RESULTS

An interaction between ISB material and IOS was found (P &#61; .001). Plasma-coated medical titanium ISBs demonstrated significantly higher trueness and precision compared to PEEK ISBs with T4 (P &#61; .001), Mi700 (P &#61; .001; P &#61; .004), and i5D (P &#61; .001). Conversely, VV exhibited higher trueness and precision values with PEEK ISBs (P &#61; .005; P &#61; .003). PS provided the highest trueness and precision regardless of the ISB material (P &#61; .912). T4 showed the lowest accuracy for PEEK ISBs, and VV showed the lowest accuracy for plasma-coated medical titanium ISBs.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for PS, all IOSs showed significant differences between ISB materials. PS demonstrated the highest accuracy with both ISB materials, whereas T4 had the lowest accuracy for PEEK ISBs, and VV showed the lowest accuracy for plasma-coated medical titanium ISBs.

Для цитирования: Azevedo Luís, Marques Tiago, Karasan Duygu, Fehmer Vincent, Sailer Irena, Correia André, Gómez Polo Miguel. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions.. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2024. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.8565.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.