DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25244
Urine Dithionite-guided Hemoperfusion in Acute Paraquat Poisoning: A Retrospective Observational Study from South India.
Аннотация
AIMS AND
BACKGROUND
Paraquat (PQ) poisoning has a mortality rate of 50-90% with no specific antidote. Hemoperfusion (HP) is used for PQ removal, but evidence for its efficacy is limited, and optimal strategies for guiding HP remain poorly defined. The study aims to describe a urine sodium dithionite test (UDT)-guided HP protocol and evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with acute PQ poisoning.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
A retrospective observational study of 27 consecutive patients with acute PQ poisoning admitted to a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in South India was conducted. Serial UDT was used to guide HP initiation, continuation, and cessation. Clinical data, treatment details, and outcomes were analyzed. Survivors and non-survivors were compared.
RESULTS
Mean age was 30.5 ± 11.2 years (74.1% male). Fourteen patients (51.9%) survived. Ingestion-to-door (I-to-D) time ≤4 h was present in 71.4% of survivors vs 20% of non-survivors. Urine sodium dithionite test negative conversion within 10 h occurred in 77.8% of survivors vs 16.7% of non-survivors. Survivors received more HP sessions (mean: 3.3 vs 2.6). Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 80% of non-survivors vs 14.3% of survivors.
CONCLUSION
Early presentation combined with a UDT-guided HP protocol was associated with favorable outcomes. Serial UDT provides a practical, low-cost tool for guiding extracorporeal treatment (ECTR) in resource-limited settings.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The UDT-guided HP protocol offers intensivists a bedside decision-making tool that replaces costly plasma PQ assays, enabling evidence-based ECTR decisions in Indian ICU settings where quantitative assays are unavailable.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.