Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2011
Intra-operative monitoring of lower extremity motor-evoked potentials by direct cortical stimulation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maruta Yuichi, Fujii Masami, Imoto Hirochika, Nomura Sadahiro, Oka Fumiaki, Goto Hisaharu, Shirao Satoshi, Yoshikawa Kouichi, Yoneda Hiroshi, Ideguchi Makoto, Suehiro Eiichi, Koizumi Hiroyasu, Ishihara Hideyuki, Kato Shoichi, Kajiwara Koji, Suzuki Michiyasu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are commonly recorded from upper-extremity muscles, whereas lower-extremity MEP (LE-MEP) monitoring has not been adequately established. The goal of the study was to develop a MEP monitoring method using direct cortical stimulation (DCS) for predicting motor deficits of lower extremities.
METHODS: Intra-operative LE-MEP monitoring was performed in 22 patients. After craniotomy, a subdural electrode was placed on the cortex so that the optimal contact was positioned 2 cm lateral from the midline on the motor cortex. The electrodes for stimulation consisted of a cathode at Fpz and an anode at the optimal contact site on the motor cortex. After stimulation was performed with short trains of five stimuli, LE-MEPs were recorded from the lower-limb muscles.
RESULTS: LE-MEPs were consistently recorded in all patients. Disappearance or amplitude reduction of MEP waveforms was observed in five patients, but the MEP waveforms had recovered and remained at the control level by dural closure, and no permanent motor deficit was observed in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS: We accomplished LE-MEP recording during supratentorial surgery using monopolar DCS with a subdural electrode placed on the convex side of the motor cortex.
SIGNIFICANCE: A useful method of intra-operative LE-MEP recording was described.
METHODS: Intra-operative LE-MEP monitoring was performed in 22 patients. After craniotomy, a subdural electrode was placed on the cortex so that the optimal contact was positioned 2 cm lateral from the midline on the motor cortex. The electrodes for stimulation consisted of a cathode at Fpz and an anode at the optimal contact site on the motor cortex. After stimulation was performed with short trains of five stimuli, LE-MEPs were recorded from the lower-limb muscles.
RESULTS: LE-MEPs were consistently recorded in all patients. Disappearance or amplitude reduction of MEP waveforms was observed in five patients, but the MEP waveforms had recovered and remained at the control level by dural closure, and no permanent motor deficit was observed in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS: We accomplished LE-MEP recording during supratentorial surgery using monopolar DCS with a subdural electrode placed on the convex side of the motor cortex.
SIGNIFICANCE: A useful method of intra-operative LE-MEP recording was described.