DOI 10.1016/j.sopen.2021.08.002
The hernia sac-A suitable source for obtaining mesenchymal stem cells.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Inguinal hernia sac, extended tissue from peritoneum, gradually enlarged in size with hernia disease time and prolapsed tissue volume. We hypothesize that mesenchymal stem cells are present in the development of hernia sac. The current study aimed to test the hypothesis that hernia sac, which is often resected and discarded as medical waste, contains mesenchymal stem cells and thus might be a suitable source to harvest mesenchymal stem cells.
METHODS
Between July 2019 and June 2020, 4 hernia sacs were resected during hernia surgery and then obtained for mesenchymal extraction using the Miltenyi gentleMACS Dissociator. The presence of mesenchymal stem cells was determined by the markers CD105, CD73, and CD90, with assessment of the expressions ≥ 95%, whereas markers CD45, CD34, CD11b, CD19, and HLA-DR were used to assess lack expression (≤ 2%). Moreover, von Kossa staining, Alcian blue staining, and Oil Red O staining were used to verify the cells' ability for differentiation.
RESULTS
Cells retrieved from the hernia sacs displayed a spindle-shaped morphology and exhibited adherence to plastics. The cell surface immunophenotypic profile was confirmed using surface markers APC-A (CD73), FITC-A (CD90), and PerCP-Cy5-5-A (CD105), with results showing 100%, 100%, and 99.2%, respectively, strongly indicating the presence of mesenchymal stem cells. Moreover, staining of in vitro cell cultures showed in vitro differentiation of precursor cells into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts, suggesting positive differentiation ability and identification of mesenchymal stem cells.
CONCLUSION
Inguinal hernia sac is a novel source of mesenchymal stem cells that can be easily obtained and stored for future usage.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.