MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1302/0301-620x.94b7.26943

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume · 2012

Mid- to long-term results of revision total knee replacement using press-fit intramedullary stems with cemented femoral and tibial components.

Manopoulos P, Havet E, Pearce O, Lardanchet J F, Mertl P

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This was a retrospective analysis of the medium- to long-term results of 46 TC3 Sigma revision total knee replacements using long uncemented stems in press-fit mode. Clinical and radiological analysis took place pre-operatively, at two years post-operatively, and at a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (4 to 12). The mean pre-operative International Knee Society (IKS) clinical score was 42 points (0 to 74), improving to 83.7 (52 to 100) by the final follow-up. The mean IKS score for function improved from 34.3 points (0 to 80) to 64.2 (15 to 100) at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up 30 knees (65.2%) had an excellent result, seven (15.2%) a good result, one (2.2%) a medium and eight (17.4%) a poor result. There were two failures, one with anteroposterior instability and one with aseptic loosening. The TC3 revision knee system, when used with press-fit for long intramedullary stems and cemented femoral and tibial components, in both septic and aseptic revisions, results in a satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome, and has a good medium- to long-term survival rate.

Для цитирования: Manopoulos P, Havet E, Pearce O, Lardanchet J F, Mertl P. Mid- to long-term results of revision total knee replacement using press-fit intramedullary stems with cemented femoral and tibial components.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 2012. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.94b7.26943.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.