Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2024
The 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases: An Observational Study on Inter-examiner Agreement among Undergraduate Students.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alshehri Majed K, Alamry Nujud, AlHarthi Shatha Subhi, BinShabaib Munerah Saleh, Alkheraif Ghaida, Alzahrani Mona, Bin Rubaian Raghad, Binnjefan Shikhah
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of the present observational study was to assess the inter-examiner agreement for the diagnosis of periodontitis using the 2018 CPD among fourth and fifth year undergraduate students. It is hypothesised that there is no difference in the inter-examiner relaibility between fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students regarding staging and grading periodontal disease using the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases (CPD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All participants received training on the 2018 CPD scheme through a mandatory periodontics course conducted by a periodontist. Documentation for seven deidentified periodontitis patients, comprising medical history, dental history including tooth loss, intra-oral photographs and radiographs, periodontal charts reporting probing depth, plaque and bleeding on probing scores, furcation involvement and clinical attachment loss, was sent via e-mail to undergraduate students. The cases consisted of one sextant, and the participants were instructed to assume the sextant to be a true representation of the entire dentition. Power analysis was done on pilot data, and the level of significance was set at p0.05.
RESULTS: The percentage of undergraduate students in the fourth and fifth year that correctly identified the stage of periodontitis according to the 2018 CPD ranged between 28% and 72% and 18.5% and 77.8%, respectively. The percentage of undergraduate students in the fourth and fifth year that correctly identified the grade of periodontitis ranged between 40% and 88% and 51.8% and 92.5%, respectively. The overall staging and grading ranged between 22.8% and 74.1%, and 45.66% and 87.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students with regards to assigning the correct diagnoses to case documentation in terms of either stage or grade.
CONCLUSION: Fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students demonstrated high inter-examiner agreement using the 2018 CPD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All participants received training on the 2018 CPD scheme through a mandatory periodontics course conducted by a periodontist. Documentation for seven deidentified periodontitis patients, comprising medical history, dental history including tooth loss, intra-oral photographs and radiographs, periodontal charts reporting probing depth, plaque and bleeding on probing scores, furcation involvement and clinical attachment loss, was sent via e-mail to undergraduate students. The cases consisted of one sextant, and the participants were instructed to assume the sextant to be a true representation of the entire dentition. Power analysis was done on pilot data, and the level of significance was set at p0.05.
RESULTS: The percentage of undergraduate students in the fourth and fifth year that correctly identified the stage of periodontitis according to the 2018 CPD ranged between 28% and 72% and 18.5% and 77.8%, respectively. The percentage of undergraduate students in the fourth and fifth year that correctly identified the grade of periodontitis ranged between 40% and 88% and 51.8% and 92.5%, respectively. The overall staging and grading ranged between 22.8% and 74.1%, and 45.66% and 87.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students with regards to assigning the correct diagnoses to case documentation in terms of either stage or grade.
CONCLUSION: Fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students demonstrated high inter-examiner agreement using the 2018 CPD.