Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2024
Evaluation of a new mouthwash formulated with Chlorhexidine and Cymenol after a scaling and root planing treatment in grade I and II periodontal patients.
Equivalence TrialСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hermida-Cabrera P, Aguilera F, Vivancos-Cuadras F, Ferrá-Domingo L, Torres-Lagares D, Gutiérrez-Pérez J, Pereira-Riveros T, Vinuesa T, Serrera-Figallo M-A, Baus-Domínguez M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is a multifactorial pathology whose treatment protocol is becoming increasingly standardized, relying, among others, on adjuvant therapies. This study aims to determine the efficacy of a new chlorhexidine compound compared with the gold standard 0.12% chlorhexidine during periodontal maintenance of a patient with periodontitis grade I or II after scaling and root planing treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trial with two arms: (A) treatment with 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash; (B) treatment with new chlorhexidine mouthwash containing O-Cymen-5-Ol. The patient was examined: (D0) initial examination, (D7) clinical examination one week after treatment, (D14) clinical examination two weeks after treatment and (D28) clinical examination three weeks after treatment. They are collecting the following data: Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding index (BoP), pocket depth (PS), and attachment loss (CAL).
RESULTS: After a follow-up of 43 patients, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any of the times or for any of the parameters evaluated, meeting the predefined criteria of non-inferiority.
CONCLUSIONS: The new chlorhexidine mouthwash proved to be non-inferior to 0.12% chlorhexidine in terms of efficacy during short-term periodontal maintenance after scaling and root planing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trial with two arms: (A) treatment with 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash; (B) treatment with new chlorhexidine mouthwash containing O-Cymen-5-Ol. The patient was examined: (D0) initial examination, (D7) clinical examination one week after treatment, (D14) clinical examination two weeks after treatment and (D28) clinical examination three weeks after treatment. They are collecting the following data: Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding index (BoP), pocket depth (PS), and attachment loss (CAL).
RESULTS: After a follow-up of 43 patients, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any of the times or for any of the parameters evaluated, meeting the predefined criteria of non-inferiority.
CONCLUSIONS: The new chlorhexidine mouthwash proved to be non-inferior to 0.12% chlorhexidine in terms of efficacy during short-term periodontal maintenance after scaling and root planing.