DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03278.x
Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection for neovascular glaucoma: a survey on 23 cases throughout 12-month follow-up.
Аннотация
AIMS: Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) represents one of the most severe forms of secondary glaucoma, caused by a number of ocular and systemic conditions, which share the common element of retinal ischaemia/hypoxia that initiates the subsequent release of angiogenesis factors, with consequent development of new abnormal vessels through the ciliary body. The aim was to examine the potential efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) (Avastin) in the treatment of NVG in patients who had already undergone the standard retinal ablative procedure.
METHODS
This was a prospective pilot trial. Clinical data of 26 eyes from 23 patients, including diagnosis, visual acuity, iris fluorescein angiography stage and intraocular pressure (IOP), were collected. Three injections of bevacizumab were scheduled for each recruited eye at 4-week intervals from the start. All investigations were repeated the day before the IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) and at the 1-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS
Regression of corneal oedema together with significant pain reduction was achieved in all eyes already after the first IVB, without any noteworthy improvement of visual acuity. At the end of the scheduled protocol (three IVB), regression of iris neovascularization was documented in all patients, together with significant improvement of visual acuity. The IOP reduction from baseline ranged from 30 to 0 mmHg (12.1 +/- 8 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS
Intravitreal bevacizumab, as adjunctive treatment to the standard retinal ablative procedure, seems promising for the management of conditions responsible of retinal ischaemia/hypoxia associated with NVG.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.