Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
Rare presentation of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) as an appendicular lump: A case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fatima Kinza, Ghayasuddin, Mushtaq Arsala, Hasan Mohammad
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMN) is about 0.2%-0.3% in the specimens of the appendix. The LAMN may appear unremarkable or can present as mucin-filled, crystally dilated tissues. The diagnosis of early-stage AMN is mostly incidental. It is of vital importance to know the features of LAMN for a timely diagnosis.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old male came with the complaint of right iliac fossa swelling along with severe intensity pain and a single episode of vomiting. A 4 × 4cm tender, soft, cystic, mobile swelling was found upon the examination. Contrast-enhanced Computerized tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen revealed the appendix diameter of 10mm well-circumscribed cystic measuring 2.1 × 2 cm. Therefore, an open resection surgery was performed. The histopathological report revealed an intraepithelial lesion composed of flat mucinous epithelial cells having eosinophilic cytoplasm and low-grade nuclear atypia.
CASE DISCUSSION: The AMNs are very rare neoplasms. The imaging modalities that can be diagnostic methods are abdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography (US), and abdominal computed tomography (CT). The low-grade features of the appendiceal mucinous neoplasms have the possibility of recurrence. The CT-scan findings of appendiceal lump>1.3cm along with cystic dilation and the calcification of the wall are the suggestive features of AMN. There is a high chance of dissemination and port site seeding in case of pneumoperitoneum.
CONCLUSION: This rare case suggests the significance of adding AMNs as a differential diagnosis in patients with abdominal pain and choosing the right approach to treat such patients to avoid complications.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old male came with the complaint of right iliac fossa swelling along with severe intensity pain and a single episode of vomiting. A 4 × 4cm tender, soft, cystic, mobile swelling was found upon the examination. Contrast-enhanced Computerized tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen revealed the appendix diameter of 10mm well-circumscribed cystic measuring 2.1 × 2 cm. Therefore, an open resection surgery was performed. The histopathological report revealed an intraepithelial lesion composed of flat mucinous epithelial cells having eosinophilic cytoplasm and low-grade nuclear atypia.
CASE DISCUSSION: The AMNs are very rare neoplasms. The imaging modalities that can be diagnostic methods are abdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography (US), and abdominal computed tomography (CT). The low-grade features of the appendiceal mucinous neoplasms have the possibility of recurrence. The CT-scan findings of appendiceal lump>1.3cm along with cystic dilation and the calcification of the wall are the suggestive features of AMN. There is a high chance of dissemination and port site seeding in case of pneumoperitoneum.
CONCLUSION: This rare case suggests the significance of adding AMNs as a differential diagnosis in patients with abdominal pain and choosing the right approach to treat such patients to avoid complications.