MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.02.015

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2014

Gland-preserving robotic surgery for benign submandibular gland tumours: a comparison between robotic and open techniques.

Yang Tsung-Lin, Ko Jenq-Yuh, Lou Pei-Jen, Wang Cheng-Ping, Hsiao Tzu-Yu

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Benign tumours of the submandibular gland are usually treated surgically. Gland-preserving techniques, which can be used to completely remove the tumour, preserve the function of the gland and reduce complications, but conventional open operations result in obvious scars on the neck. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of gland-preserving robotic surgery using a hairline approach. We compared robotic with open techniques for gland-preserving operations to remove benign tumours of the submandibular gland. Patients were matched for age and sex (4 in each group). All patients in the robotic surgery group had their tumours removed successfully through hairline approaches. No patient had operative complications or postoperative functional nerve deficit, and an aesthetically pleasing outcome was achieved by concealing the scars within the hairline. Robotic operations took longer than open operations. No recurrence was noted during follow-up. Gland-preserving robotic surgery is a feasible alternative to conventional techniques and has potential advantages for safety and aesthetic outcome.

Для цитирования: Yang Tsung-Lin, Ko Jenq-Yuh, Lou Pei-Jen, Wang Cheng-Ping, Hsiao Tzu-Yu. Gland-preserving robotic surgery for benign submandibular gland tumours: a comparison between robotic and open techniques.. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.02.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.