Surgical endoscopy · 2018
Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with a new marking technique, endoscopic cautery marking: preservation of the stomach in patients with upper early gastric cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamiya Satoshi, Ohashi Manabu, Ida Satoshi, Kumagai Koshi, Nunobe Souya, Sano Takeshi, Hiki Naoki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LsTG) has several advantages, including technical safety and preservation of postoperative function, compared with total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. However, LsTG has some technical issues with respect to achieving a safe resection margin and patency in patients with lesions close to the cardia or fornix. When LsTG is performed for lesions located rather close to the cardia or fornix, conventional marking clips can physically hinder transection by an endoscopic linear stapler. Additionally, tracing the tumor boundary to create a precise resection line is difficult. To resolve these issues, we introduced a new marking technique called endoscopic cautery marking (ECM) involving the creation of small cauterized spots.
METHODS: Of 791 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy from 2015 to 2017, 16 underwent LsTG with ECM. Before surgery, ECM was performed and the pathological tumor boundary was traced according to preoperative biopsies. Under intraoperative endoscopic guidance, we divided the stomach with an endoscopic linear stapler on the proximal side of the ECM site and examined the stump by pathological frozen section analysis to confirm the absence of cancer.
RESULTS: The median length of the endoscopically measured distance from the esophagogastric junction to the tumor was 30.0 mm (range 15-40 mm), and the median pathological proximal margin was 11.5 mm (range 0-26 mm). Although the ECM site was completely resected in all patients, frozen section analysis showed a positive margin in one lesion, which had an unclear tumor boundary due to gastritis. For this patient, we converted the procedure to laparoscopic completion gastrectomy. No severe complications or recurrences occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: LsTG with ECM was technically feasible, and short-term outcomes were acceptable in this preliminary study. Further experience and investigations are imperative to verify the oncological and functional implications of LsTG with ECM.
METHODS: Of 791 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy from 2015 to 2017, 16 underwent LsTG with ECM. Before surgery, ECM was performed and the pathological tumor boundary was traced according to preoperative biopsies. Under intraoperative endoscopic guidance, we divided the stomach with an endoscopic linear stapler on the proximal side of the ECM site and examined the stump by pathological frozen section analysis to confirm the absence of cancer.
RESULTS: The median length of the endoscopically measured distance from the esophagogastric junction to the tumor was 30.0 mm (range 15-40 mm), and the median pathological proximal margin was 11.5 mm (range 0-26 mm). Although the ECM site was completely resected in all patients, frozen section analysis showed a positive margin in one lesion, which had an unclear tumor boundary due to gastritis. For this patient, we converted the procedure to laparoscopic completion gastrectomy. No severe complications or recurrences occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: LsTG with ECM was technically feasible, and short-term outcomes were acceptable in this preliminary study. Further experience and investigations are imperative to verify the oncological and functional implications of LsTG with ECM.