MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00595-010-4361-6

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery today · 2011

Synchronous solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: report of a case.

Imamura Naoya, Chijiiwa Kazuo, Ohuchida Jiro, Hiyoshi Masahide, Takahashi Nobuyasu, Yorita Kenji, Kataoka Hiroaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas, most commonly found in young female subjects, is a rare neoplasm with low potential for malignancy. We report an unusual case of a 66-year-old male patient who had a simultaneous malignant SPN and an intraductal papillary mucinous adenoma (IPMA) of the pancreas. The patient was admitted to our department for the evaluation of the main solid tumor with calcification and small multilocular cystic lesions apart from the main tumor in the pancreatic head. We performed pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy to treat the calcified tumor and multilocular cystic lesions. The diagnosis of malignant SPN was confirmed on the basis of histological invasion to the adjacent structures. The separate cystic lesions were diagnosed as a branch-type IPMA. The synchronous occurrence of IPMA and SPN in the present case did not demonstrate that there were tumors maintained through the common abnormal Wnt signaling pathway by immunohistochemical study. To our knowledge, this is the first known case of synchronous SPN and IPMA of the pancreas.

Для цитирования: Imamura Naoya, Chijiiwa Kazuo, Ohuchida Jiro, Hiyoshi Masahide, Takahashi Nobuyasu, Yorita Kenji, Kataoka Hiroaki. Synchronous solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: report of a case.. Surgery today. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-010-4361-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.