American journal of dentistry · 2000
Stain removal efficacy of two new fluoride dentifrices containing essential oils.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu D, Schemehorn B R, Luo D, Kohut B E, Parikh R, Santos S L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess in vitro the stain removal efficacy of two new antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrices utilizing a modification of a previously validated Stookey method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The modifications to the original Stookey method are the following: (1) study design; three 5 x 5 Latin Squares were employed to minimize bias stemming from position or test run in the study. (2) statistical success criteria; a test formulation was judged to be effective if the lower one-sided 95% confidence limit was "equal to or higher than" 50 since a minimum PCR (pellicle cleaning ratio) score of 50 is needed for a dentifrice to show clinical efficacy. The two test dentifrice formulations contained a fluoride source, a silica abrasive system, and four essential oils. The ADA reference abrasive material (calcium pyrophosphate) and placebo toothpaste were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.
RESULTS: Compared to the negative control, the positive control exhibited a statistically higher PCR score; therefore, the validity of this modified Stookey method was confirmed. Additionally, the lower limits of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the two dentifrice formulations were above the threshold PCR of 50; therefore, this modified Stookey method should predict that both essential oil-containing dentifrices possess acceptable stain removal power.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The modifications to the original Stookey method are the following: (1) study design; three 5 x 5 Latin Squares were employed to minimize bias stemming from position or test run in the study. (2) statistical success criteria; a test formulation was judged to be effective if the lower one-sided 95% confidence limit was "equal to or higher than" 50 since a minimum PCR (pellicle cleaning ratio) score of 50 is needed for a dentifrice to show clinical efficacy. The two test dentifrice formulations contained a fluoride source, a silica abrasive system, and four essential oils. The ADA reference abrasive material (calcium pyrophosphate) and placebo toothpaste were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.
RESULTS: Compared to the negative control, the positive control exhibited a statistically higher PCR score; therefore, the validity of this modified Stookey method was confirmed. Additionally, the lower limits of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the two dentifrice formulations were above the threshold PCR of 50; therefore, this modified Stookey method should predict that both essential oil-containing dentifrices possess acceptable stain removal power.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiasCalcium PyrophosphateCariostatic AgentsCattleConfidence IntervalsDental PellicleDental PlaqueDentifricesFluoridesGingivitisOils, VolatilePlacebosRandom AllocationReproducibility of ResultsSilicon DioxideSingle-Blind MethodTooth DiscolorationTreatment Outcome