MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215122002316

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2022

Impact of manual crimping on stapedotomy outcomes.

Couvreur F, Schlegel-Wagner C, Linder T

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The impact of tight stapes crimping on hearing is a matter of debate. Several studies postulate that tight crimping is essential for lifelong success, whereas others have debated whether firm attachment leads to incus necrosis. Several types of prostheses with different coupling mechanisms have been developed, and manual crimping remains the most frequently used technique. This study investigates whether tightness really does affect hearing outcome.

METHODS

The hearing results of patients who underwent primary stapedotomies using three different titanium pistons were analysed. The surgeons categorised the firmness of the piston attachment into 'tight' and 'loose' crimping groups. Hearing outcome and reasons for revision surgical procedures were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean post-operative air-bone gap for frequencies of 0.5-4 kHz was 8.80 dB for the tight crimping group (n = 308) and 9.55 dB for the loose crimping group (n = 39). No significant difference was found (p = 0.4650). Findings at revision procedures were comparable (1.6 per cent vs 5 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Although firm crimping is strongly advised, a movable loop upon palpation does not lead to unsatisfactory hearing results, and does not mandate piston replacement or bone cement use.

Для цитирования: Couvreur F, Schlegel-Wagner C, Linder T. Impact of manual crimping on stapedotomy outcomes.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2022. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215122002316.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.