Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
Impact of intraduodenal acetic acid infusion on pancreatic duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fang Jun, Wang Shu-Ling, Zhao Sheng-Bing, Hu Liang-Hao, Yao Jun, Shen Zhen, Gu Lun, Xia Tian, Cai Qiang, Li Zhao-Shen, Bai Yu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with risk of complications. Methods to facilitate ductal cannulation may reduce complications. Intraduodenal acid infusion is a physiological approach to stimulate secretin release in human body and may facilitate cannulation. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of intraduodenal acid infusion on pancreatic duct cannulation during ERCP.
METHODS: It was a single center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients undergoing first ERCP for pancreatic diseases were randomized toreceive 50 mL acetic acid intraduodenal infusion at ERCP (acetic acid group) or 50 mL saline (control group). The primary outcome, difficult cannulation rate (cannulation time >5 min), in the two groups was compared.
RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients were included in the final analysis (105 in each group). The difficult cannulation rate were 39.1% in the control group and 20.9% in the acetic acid group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.004). The overall successful deep cannulation rate was 89.5% and 85.7%, respectively (P = 0.402). The cannulation time was remarkably shortened (182 vs 286 s, P = 0.018), and the cannulation attempts were significantly decreased (3.4 vs 4.4, P = 0.008). The fluoroscopy time was also significantly reduced (60 vs 86 s, P = 0.028). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia was comparable (7.6% vs 10.5% and 10.5% vs 19.1%, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Intraduodenal acetic acid infusion can significantly decrease difficult pancreatic cannulation rate, facilitate pancreatic duct cannulation, and reduce radiation exposure (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02800772).
METHODS: It was a single center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients undergoing first ERCP for pancreatic diseases were randomized toreceive 50 mL acetic acid intraduodenal infusion at ERCP (acetic acid group) or 50 mL saline (control group). The primary outcome, difficult cannulation rate (cannulation time >5 min), in the two groups was compared.
RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients were included in the final analysis (105 in each group). The difficult cannulation rate were 39.1% in the control group and 20.9% in the acetic acid group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.004). The overall successful deep cannulation rate was 89.5% and 85.7%, respectively (P = 0.402). The cannulation time was remarkably shortened (182 vs 286 s, P = 0.018), and the cannulation attempts were significantly decreased (3.4 vs 4.4, P = 0.008). The fluoroscopy time was also significantly reduced (60 vs 86 s, P = 0.028). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia was comparable (7.6% vs 10.5% and 10.5% vs 19.1%, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Intraduodenal acetic acid infusion can significantly decrease difficult pancreatic cannulation rate, facilitate pancreatic duct cannulation, and reduce radiation exposure (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02800772).