MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2015/939748

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of ophthalmology · 2015

Retinal Damage Induced by Internal Limiting Membrane Removal.

Gelman Rachel, Stevenson William, Prospero Ponce Claudia, Agarwal Daniel, Christoforidis John Byron

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The internal limiting membrane (ILM), the basement membrane of the Müller cells, serves as the interface between the vitreous body and the retinal nerve fiber layer. It has a fundamental role in the development, structure, and function of the retina, although it also is a pathologic component in the various vitreoretinal disorders, most notably in macular holes. It was not until understanding of the evolution of idiopathic macular holes and the advent of idiopathic macular hole surgery that the idea of adjuvant ILM peeling in the treatment of tractional maculopathies was explored. Today intentional ILM peeling is a commonly applied surgical technique among vitreoretinal surgeons as it has been found to increase the rate of successful macular hole closure and improve surgical outcomes in other vitreoretinal diseases. Though ILM peeling has refined surgery for tractional maculopathies, like all surgical procedures it is not immune to perioperative risk. The essential role of the ILM to the integrity of the retina and risk of trauma to retinal tissue spurs suspicion with regard to its routine removal. Several authors have investigated the retinal damage induced by ILM peeling and these complications have been manifested across many different diagnostic studies.

Для цитирования: Gelman Rachel, Stevenson William, Prospero Ponce Claudia, Agarwal Daniel, Christoforidis John Byron. Retinal Damage Induced by Internal Limiting Membrane Removal.. Journal of ophthalmology. 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/939748.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.