AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022
Comparison of the Utility of High-Resolution CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI Fusion Images for the Localization of Cholesteatoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fan X, Ding C, Liu Z
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholesteatoma is an aggressive disease that may lead to hearing impairment. This study aimed to compare the utility of high-resolution CT and TSE-DWI fusion images with that of T2WI and TSE-DWI fusion images in the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were retrospectively recruited. High-resolution CT, T2WI with fat suppression, and TSE-DWI scans were obtained, and image fusion was performed using a 3D reconstruction postprocessing workstation to form CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images. The quality of the 2 fused images was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the horizontal semicircular canal transverse position as the reference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the diagnostic efficacies of CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images in localizing middle ear cholesteatoma were calculated.
RESULTS: The overall quality of T2WI-DWI fusion images was slightly higher than that of CT-DWI fusion images (P < .001), and the semicircular canal was slightly less clear on T2WI-DWI than on CT-DWI (P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic confidence between them. In the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of T2WI-DWI fusion images and CT-DWI fusion images were equivalent for involvement of the attic, tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and mastoid process, with no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: T2WI-DWI fusion images could replace CT-DWI in the preoperative selection of surgical options for middle ear cholesteatoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were retrospectively recruited. High-resolution CT, T2WI with fat suppression, and TSE-DWI scans were obtained, and image fusion was performed using a 3D reconstruction postprocessing workstation to form CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images. The quality of the 2 fused images was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the horizontal semicircular canal transverse position as the reference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the diagnostic efficacies of CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images in localizing middle ear cholesteatoma were calculated.
RESULTS: The overall quality of T2WI-DWI fusion images was slightly higher than that of CT-DWI fusion images (P < .001), and the semicircular canal was slightly less clear on T2WI-DWI than on CT-DWI (P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic confidence between them. In the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of T2WI-DWI fusion images and CT-DWI fusion images were equivalent for involvement of the attic, tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and mastoid process, with no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: T2WI-DWI fusion images could replace CT-DWI in the preoperative selection of surgical options for middle ear cholesteatoma.