Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2013
Validity of a new respiratory resistance measurement device to detect glottal area change.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gallena Sally J K, Tian Wei, Johnson Arthur T, Vossoughi Jafar, Sarles Stephen A, Solomon Nancy Pearl
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between respiratory resistance (Rr) values measured with the Airflow Perturbation Device (APD) to laryngoscopic images of glottal area (GA) in feigned paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM), also known as vocal cord dysfunction.
HYPOTHESIS: There is a strong inverse relationship between Rr and GA such that laryngeal constriction can be detected and quantified by APD-measured Rr.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single subject study.
METHODS: A healthy adult feigned breathing that was characteristic of PVFM. Rr and GA were simultaneously recorded, synchronized, and analyzed for three complete breathing cycles with significant glottal constriction occurring during inspiration.
RESULTS: Cross-correlation analysis revealed a strong negative correlation (-0.824) between GA and Rr during feigned PVFM breathing such that Rr increased when GA decreased.
CONCLUSION: APD-measured Rr appears to be a viable noninvasive method for diagnostic screening and monitoring of treatment outcomes for individuals presenting with dyspnea related to PVFM.
HYPOTHESIS: There is a strong inverse relationship between Rr and GA such that laryngeal constriction can be detected and quantified by APD-measured Rr.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single subject study.
METHODS: A healthy adult feigned breathing that was characteristic of PVFM. Rr and GA were simultaneously recorded, synchronized, and analyzed for three complete breathing cycles with significant glottal constriction occurring during inspiration.
RESULTS: Cross-correlation analysis revealed a strong negative correlation (-0.824) between GA and Rr during feigned PVFM breathing such that Rr increased when GA decreased.
CONCLUSION: APD-measured Rr appears to be a viable noninvasive method for diagnostic screening and monitoring of treatment outcomes for individuals presenting with dyspnea related to PVFM.