MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eja.0b013e32835c1cdb

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of anaesthesiology · 2013

Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.

Buléon Clément, Parienti Jean-Jacques, Lesage Anne, Grandin Wilfried, Pouliquen Emmanuel, Flais Frédéric, Simonet Thérèse, Gérard Jean-Louis, Hanouz Jean-Luc

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Plastic single-use laryngoscope blades have been found to increase the difficulty of intubation. Metallic single-use blades may represent an alternative.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of intubation failure at first laryngoscopy using metallic single-use, plastic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades.

DESIGN

Randomised, superiority, single-centre, controlled trial.

SETTING

Operating theatres at a University Hospital from January 2008 to August 2009.

PATIENTS: A total of 1863 adults requiring general anaesthesia.

INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to one of three laryngoscope blades: metallic single-use, plastic single-use or metallic reusable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary end-point was the number of intubation failures at first laryngoscopy. Secondary end-points were glottic exposure and the Intubation Difficulty Scale.

RESULTS

The failure rate (absolute difference: 95% confidence interval) at the first attempt was greater for the plastic single-use blades (8.1%) than for the metallic reusable [3.2% (4.9%: 2.2 to 7.6%); P < 0.001] and metallic reusable blades [4.0% (4.0%: 1.2 to 6.9%); P < 0.006]. No difference was found between the metallic reusable and metallic single-use groups (0.9%: -1.3 to 3.1%). Scoring on the Intubation Difficulty Scale [median (interquartile range)] was higher in the plastic single-use group [1 (0 to 2)] than in the metallic groups [metallic reusable: 0 (0 to 1); P < 0.001 and metallic single-use: 0 (0 to 1); P < 0.007] groups. Glottic exposure was significantly better in the metallic reusable group (modified Cormack & Lehane score III and IV: 3.7%) compared with the plastic single-use group (modified Cormack & Lehane score III and IV: 9.4%; P < 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The rates of failed intubation at first laryngoscopy were similar in the metallic reusable and metallic reusable groups, but greater in the plastic single-use group.

Для цитирования: Buléon Clément, Parienti Jean-Jacques, Lesage Anne, Grandin Wilfried, Pouliquen Emmanuel, Flais Frédéric, Simonet Thérèse, Gérard Jean-Louis, Hanouz Jean-Luc. Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32835c1cdb.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.