MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2003.09.024

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical radiology · 2004

Computed tomography of odontogenic myxoma.

MacDonald-Jankowski D S, Yeung R W K, Li T, Lee K M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the computed tomography (CT) presentation of odontogenic myxoma (OM) in a Chinese population and to compare them with those observed on the accompanying conventional radiographs (CR).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The files of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Hong Kong between 1989 and 2000 were reviewed for myxoma cases.

RESULTS

Ten cases of OM were found of which eight had been investigated by CT. The formatted hard copy was found in seven cases, four in the maxilla and three in the mandible. Most of the OMs had a round shape but one was fusiform. CT was more likely to display a cortex and its perforation. All OMs had perforated cortices on CT with soft tissue appearing outside the bony contour in two cases. Contrast enhancement was apparent in six cases. Both CR and CT displayed septae, but the latter method revealed that most septae were situated at the periphery, presenting as "sunray" type spicules in one case. Tooth displacement and root resorption were more reliably observed on CR.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of perforation and pattern of septa of OM is better displayed by CT. CR should also allow a better assessment of the degree of definition of the lesion's margins with adjacent normal bone. Therefore, both CT and CR should be used in an investigation of an OM.

Для цитирования: MacDonald-Jankowski D S, Yeung R W K, Li T, Lee K M. Computed tomography of odontogenic myxoma.. Clinical radiology. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.09.024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.