Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2015
Technical Video: Bilateral Tubal Adhesiolysis With Cuff Salpingostomy.
Клинический случайСтатьяVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shakir Fevzi, Kent Andrew
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show the steps involved in a bilateral tubal adhesiolysis and cuff salpingostomy.
DESIGN: Technical video showing tubal adhesiolysis and cuff salpingostomy in a step-by-step approach.
SETTING: Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK, a tertiary referral unit for complex gynecologic endoscopic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: A 38-year-old woman presented with left-sided pelvic pain and primary infertility for 13 years. An ultrasound scan showed bilateral hydrosalpinges with suspected adnexal adhesions. Hysterosalpingography did not show spill of dye. After counseling, she opted to have tubal adhesiolysis and bilateral cuff salpingostomy.
CONCLUSION: Tubal surgery for occlusion has become less popular because of the superior success rates of assisted reproductive techniques. As a result, tubal surgery may eventually become a historic operation. However, in cases of distal tubal blockage after adhesionlysis and cuff salpingostomy or neosalpingostomy, pregnancy rates up to 35% have been reported in the literature. Furthermore, performing a bilateral salpingectomy instead in these cases renders a patient entirely dependent on assisted reproductive techniques for tubal factor infertility. Therefore, a bilateral cuff salpingostomy should be considered in a select group of patients.
DESIGN: Technical video showing tubal adhesiolysis and cuff salpingostomy in a step-by-step approach.
SETTING: Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK, a tertiary referral unit for complex gynecologic endoscopic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: A 38-year-old woman presented with left-sided pelvic pain and primary infertility for 13 years. An ultrasound scan showed bilateral hydrosalpinges with suspected adnexal adhesions. Hysterosalpingography did not show spill of dye. After counseling, she opted to have tubal adhesiolysis and bilateral cuff salpingostomy.
CONCLUSION: Tubal surgery for occlusion has become less popular because of the superior success rates of assisted reproductive techniques. As a result, tubal surgery may eventually become a historic operation. However, in cases of distal tubal blockage after adhesionlysis and cuff salpingostomy or neosalpingostomy, pregnancy rates up to 35% have been reported in the literature. Furthermore, performing a bilateral salpingectomy instead in these cases renders a patient entirely dependent on assisted reproductive techniques for tubal factor infertility. Therefore, a bilateral cuff salpingostomy should be considered in a select group of patients.