MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.100.609

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2009

[Clinical study of upper urinary tract carcinoma].

Saito Jun, Kanemitsu Toshiyuki, Sato Mototaka, Mori Naoki, Nakatsuka Shin-Ichi, Sekii Kenichiro, Yoshioka Toshiaki, Itatani Hiroaki

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We retrospectively reviewed 107 patients of upper urinary tract carcinoma to determine the overall outcome, prognostic factors, frequency of subsequent bladder cancer and role of adjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

107 patients of upper urinary tract carcinoma, who underwent surgical treatment at Sumitomo Hospital between January 1992 and June 2007 were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's proportional hazard model were used.

RESULTS

Five-year disease specific survival, progression free survival and bladder recurrence free rates in all patients were 88.1%, 51.2% and 64.9% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed squamous differentiation to be the most important prognostic factor. Five-year disease specific survival in locally advanced upper urinary tract carcinoma treated with adjuvant chemoradiation was 74.0%, which was not statistically different from it without chemoradiation.

CONCLUSION

Our series suggests that the adjuvant chemoradiation does not improve the outcome in patients with locally advanced upper urinary tract carcinoma.

Для цитирования: Saito Jun, Kanemitsu Toshiyuki, Sato Mototaka, Mori Naoki, Nakatsuka Shin-Ichi, Sekii Kenichiro, Yoshioka Toshiaki, Itatani Hiroaki. [Clinical study of upper urinary tract carcinoma].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 2009. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.100.609.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.