Bladder neck plication stitch: a novel technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve recovery of urinary continence.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Efforts to improve postprostatectomy incontinence have led to many modifications in surgical technique. We present our experience with a novel technique to improve continence outcomes in patients who are undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
A consecutive series of 159 patients after initiation of a bladder neck plication stitch was compared with the most recent group before the change. After completion of the vesicourethral anastomosis, a single suture was used to plicate the distal bladder neck. A structured questionnaire was used for follow-up. Continence criteria used were 1 pad per day for social continence and 0 pad per day for total continence.
RESULTS
A total of 334 patients were included in the study: 159 in the plication stitch group vs 175 in the control group. Average age was 59.1 vs 59.6 years, average body mass index was 27.9 vs 28.3 kg/m(2), and average prostate volume was 58.1 vs 60.9 cc, respectively. The mean time to reach social continence was 3.63±3.01 vs 5.33±4.89 weeks (P=0.004), and total continence was 5.10±3.80 vs 8.49±6.32 weeks (P=0.002), respectively. Chance of total continence improved with the bladder plication stitch: Odds ratio of 1.95±0.72 (P<0.001) at 1 month, 1.25±0.56 (P=0.113) at 3 months, and 2.07±0.66 (P=0.005) at 12 months. There were no bladder neck contractures or other urinary complications noted in either group.
CONCLUSIONS
The bladder plication stitch is a simple and effective technical modification for shortening the period of recovery of urinary continence in RARP patients. Randomized controlled trials are under way to further evaluate this technique.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.