MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3325/cmj.2019.60.431

Медицинская библиотека · Croatian medical journal · 2019

Efficacy of adalimumab therapy in experimental rat sclerosing encapsulated peritonitis model.

Akgun Yeliz, Bakirdogen Serkan, Kadioglu Kocak Meral Gulay, Bektas Sibel, Demir Ceren, Akbal Erdem, Elmas Sait

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of adalimumab treatment in an experimental rat sclerosing encapsulated peritonitis (SEP) model.

METHODS

The study involved 40 Wistar albino rats divided into four groups: chlorhexidine (CH) group, control group, CH + adalimumab group, and CH + resting group. The control group received normal saline intraperitoneally (i.p.). Other groups received 0.1% CH gluconate, 15% ethanol, and normal saline mixture i.p. for three weeks in order to induce SEP. CH + adalimumab group received 5 mg/kg adalimumab i.p. at the beginning of week 4 and week 6, while CH + resting group was followed-up for three weeks without applying any procedure after the onset of SEP. Rats in groups CH and control group were sacrificed on day 21, and rats in group CH + adalimumab and CH + resting were sacrificed on day 42. All groups were evaluated for peritoneal thickness, inflammation, vascularization, and fibrosis.

RESULTS

CH + adalimumab group showed a significant decrease in peritoneal thickness, fibrosis score, and vascular score compared with CH group and CH + resting group.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab can prevent SEP development.

Для цитирования: Akgun Yeliz, Bakirdogen Serkan, Kadioglu Kocak Meral Gulay, Bektas Sibel, Demir Ceren, Akbal Erdem, Elmas Sait. Efficacy of adalimumab therapy in experimental rat sclerosing encapsulated peritonitis model.. Croatian medical journal. 2019. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2019.60.431.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.