International journal of surgery case reports · 2019
The clinical dilemma of the persistent idiopathic pneumoperitoneum: A case report.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hannan Enda, Saad Eltaib, Hoashi Shu, Toomey Desmond
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pneumoperitoneum (IP) is a rare phenomenon which merits special attention. It is defined as free intraperitoneal air which is not caused by viscus perforation and does not require surgical intervention. It is generally considered a diagnosis of exclusion and often poses a genuine diagnostic dilemma.
PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present an unusual case of persistent pneumoperitoneum with no identifiable cause which was found incidentally on a computed tomography (CT) scan in a patient with chronic cough and no prior surgical history. Serial consults revealed no abdominal symptoms or signs. He was managed conservatively and remains asymptomatic despite having a persistent IP on serial radiology.
DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, our case is the first in the literature of an idiopathic pneumoperitoneum that persisted on subsequent radiology and was managed successfully without surgical intervention. This is a highly important case for all practicing general surgeons to learn from as knowledge of this phenomenom may help avoid unnecessary surgical intervention and potential morbidities associated with this.
CONCLUSION: IP is a diagnosis of exclusion which should only be made after surgical and non-surgical causes have been outruled. In the absence of signs of peritonitis and evidence of gastrointestinal perforation on CT, a conservative approach is warranted, allowing patients to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.
PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present an unusual case of persistent pneumoperitoneum with no identifiable cause which was found incidentally on a computed tomography (CT) scan in a patient with chronic cough and no prior surgical history. Serial consults revealed no abdominal symptoms or signs. He was managed conservatively and remains asymptomatic despite having a persistent IP on serial radiology.
DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, our case is the first in the literature of an idiopathic pneumoperitoneum that persisted on subsequent radiology and was managed successfully without surgical intervention. This is a highly important case for all practicing general surgeons to learn from as knowledge of this phenomenom may help avoid unnecessary surgical intervention and potential morbidities associated with this.
CONCLUSION: IP is a diagnosis of exclusion which should only be made after surgical and non-surgical causes have been outruled. In the absence of signs of peritonitis and evidence of gastrointestinal perforation on CT, a conservative approach is warranted, allowing patients to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.