Clinical oral investigations · 2024
Clinical outcomes and supragingival microbiota analysis around dental implants and teeth in patients with a history of periodontitis: a preliminary study of 6 months follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sim Nicholas Choo Wee, Al-Maleki Anis Rageh, Sulaiman Eshamsul, Mohamad-Hassan Norul Husna, Safii Syarida Hasnur
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the supragingival microbiome surrounding dental implants and neighbouring tooth in periodontitis history and periodontally healthy patients.
METHODS: Subjects with a history of periodontitis (test) and periodontally healthy subjects (control) received one of two types of dental implants with different surface characteristics: sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) or precision dimension laser-treated (PDL). Periodontal clinical measurements were collected at baseline (V1), 3 months after implant placement (V4), at zirconia crown placement (V6) and 3 months after zirconia crown placement (V8). Supragingival bacterial microbiota was studied using Illumina MiSeq sequencing.
RESULTS: Supragingival microbial community on SLA implants in test group significantly differed to control group at V8 (p < 0.05). A longitudinal shift displaying microbial dysbiosis occurred on SLA implants (p < 0.05) and adjacent teeth (p < 0.05) among test patients from V6 to V8. On PDL implants and the adjacent tooth, no significant difference between test and control groups from V6 to V8 (p > 0.05). Co-occurrence network in test group of SLA implants and the adjacent tooth at V8 showed increased disease-associated bacteria and reduced health-associated bacteria. Health-associated bacteria were dominant in control group of SLA implants at V8.
CONCLUSION: The surface characteristics and prosthetic components of dental implants may be important risk factors in patients with a history of periodontitis.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dysbiosis of supragingival microbiome may predispose dental implants to peri-implant diseases. Thus, a strict supportive periodontal care plan is imperative to prevent early onset of biological complications.
METHODS: Subjects with a history of periodontitis (test) and periodontally healthy subjects (control) received one of two types of dental implants with different surface characteristics: sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) or precision dimension laser-treated (PDL). Periodontal clinical measurements were collected at baseline (V1), 3 months after implant placement (V4), at zirconia crown placement (V6) and 3 months after zirconia crown placement (V8). Supragingival bacterial microbiota was studied using Illumina MiSeq sequencing.
RESULTS: Supragingival microbial community on SLA implants in test group significantly differed to control group at V8 (p < 0.05). A longitudinal shift displaying microbial dysbiosis occurred on SLA implants (p < 0.05) and adjacent teeth (p < 0.05) among test patients from V6 to V8. On PDL implants and the adjacent tooth, no significant difference between test and control groups from V6 to V8 (p > 0.05). Co-occurrence network in test group of SLA implants and the adjacent tooth at V8 showed increased disease-associated bacteria and reduced health-associated bacteria. Health-associated bacteria were dominant in control group of SLA implants at V8.
CONCLUSION: The surface characteristics and prosthetic components of dental implants may be important risk factors in patients with a history of periodontitis.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dysbiosis of supragingival microbiome may predispose dental implants to peri-implant diseases. Thus, a strict supportive periodontal care plan is imperative to prevent early onset of biological complications.