MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02926-0

Медицинская библиотека · Communications biology · 2021

Aesthetic appraisals of literary style and emotional intensity in narrative engagement are neurally dissociable.

Hartung Franziska, Wang Yuchao, Mak Marloes, Willems Roel, Chatterjee Anjan

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Humans are deeply affected by stories, yet it is unclear how. In this study, we explored two aspects of aesthetic experiences during narrative engagement - literariness and narrative fluctuations in appraised emotional intensity. Independent ratings of literariness and emotional intensity of two literary stories were used to predict blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal changes in 52 listeners from an existing fMRI dataset. Literariness was associated with increased activation in brain areas linked to semantic integration (left angular gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and precuneus), and decreased activation in bilateral middle temporal cortices, associated with semantic representations and word memory. Emotional intensity correlated with decreased activation in a bilateral frontoparietal network that is often associated with controlled attention. Our results confirm a neural dissociation in processing literary form and emotional content in stories and generate new questions about the function of and interaction between attention, social cognition, and semantic systems during literary engagement and aesthetic experiences.

Для цитирования: Hartung Franziska, Wang Yuchao, Mak Marloes, Willems Roel, Chatterjee Anjan. Aesthetic appraisals of literary style and emotional intensity in narrative engagement are neurally dissociable.. Communications biology. 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02926-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.