MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sle.0000000000000639

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2019

A Comparative Study of Double-Tract Reconstruction and Roux-en-Y After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Hong Jun, Wang Shu-Yan, Hao Han-Kun

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The meta-analysis was performed to compare surgical and functional results of double-tract (DT) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction, applied in both partial and total gastrectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Wiley, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library Central were searched for studies comparing DT and RY after partial or total gastrectomy. Surgical, nutritional, and long-term outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 595 patients from 8 studies were included. Operative time, time to first flatus, length of hospital stays, complications, postoperative nutritional variables, and functional result were similar between 2 groups. Group DT had significantly less blood loss, shorter time to oral intake and less loss of body weight at 2 years after operation.

CONCLUSIONS

DT reconstruction is comparable with RY after gastrectomy in safety, surgical outcomes including reflux symptom and postoperative recovery and shows better food intake and body weight maintenance.

Для цитирования: Hong Jun, Wang Shu-Yan, Hao Han-Kun. A Comparative Study of Double-Tract Reconstruction and Roux-en-Y After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000639.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.