MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13019-018-0811-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2019

The 2 years' long-term efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review.

Li Huan, Peng Wei, Huang Shu, Ren Yutang, Peng Yan, Li Qing, Wu Jiao, Fu Xiangsheng, Tang Xiaowei

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: In this retrospective review, we aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of POEM with follow-up period over 2 years.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A systematic review related to POEM for achalasia was conducted. A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane and EBSCO databases on November 2017. The following postoperative outcomes were extracted: Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, complications and clinical success.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 373. The mean operative time was 66.7 min and the overall rate of complications was 21.2%. The mean follow-up period was 30.0 months. The overall clinical success rate was 92.9% and the rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease was 10.2%. Rate of mortality after POEM was 0.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that POEM is effective and safe for treating achalasia during the long-term followed up over 2 years.

Для цитирования: Li Huan, Peng Wei, Huang Shu, Ren Yutang, Peng Yan, Li Qing, Wu Jiao, Fu Xiangsheng, Tang Xiaowei. The 2 years' long-term efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review.. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-018-0811-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.