Interobserver Variability in Manual Versus Semi-Automatic CT Assessments of Small Lung Nodule Diameter and Volume.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the interobserver variability of semi-automatic diameter and volumetric measurements versus manual diameter measurements for small lung nodules identified on computed tomography scans.

METHODS

The radiological patient database was searched for CT thorax examinations with at least one noncalcified solid nodule (∼3-10 mm). Three radiologists with four to six years of experience evaluated each nodule in accordance with the Fleischner Society guidelines using standard diameter measurements, semi-automatic lesion diameter measurements, and volumetric assessments. Spearman's correlation coefficient measured intermeasurement agreement. We used descriptive Bland-Altman plots to visualize agreement in the measured data. Potential discrepancies were analyzed.

RESULTS

We studied a total of twenty-six nodules. Spearman's test showed that there was a much stronger relationship (p < 0.05) between reviewers for the semi-automatic diameter and volume measurements (avg. r = 0.97 ± 0.017 and 0.99 ± 0.005, respectively) than for the manual method (avg. r = 0.91 ± 0.017). In the Bland-Altman test, the semi-automatic diameter measure outperformed the manual method for all comparisons, while the volumetric method had better results in two out of three comparisons. The incidence of reviewers modifying the software's automatic outline varied between 62% and 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

Semi-automatic techniques significantly reduced interobserver variability for small solid nodules, which has important implications for diagnostic assessments and screening. Both the semi-automatic diameter and semi-automatic volume measurements showed improvements over the manual measurement approach. Training could further diminish observer variability, given the considerable diversity in the number of adjustments among reviewers.