DOI 10.1080/10749357.2025.2571564
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Post-stroke shoulder pain (PSSP) is a common complication of stroke survivors, substantially impeding upper-limb functional recovery and diminishing quality of life. Conventional treatments usually target peripheral symptoms and only yield limited or transient benefits. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown analgesic potential in various neuropathic pain conditions, yet its efficacy in PSSP lacks systematic evaluation.
METHODS
Eight databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating rTMS interventions for PSSP. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale or numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Barthel Index, and shoulder range of motion. Risk assessment and data analysis were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1, with heterogeneity quantified by the I2 statistic and subgroup analyses conducted to explore its potential sources.
RESULTS
12 RCTs involving over 500 participants met the inclusion criteria. Results revealed that rTMS significantly reduced pain intensity compared to control (WMD: -1.62; 95% CI: -2.00, -1.24; p < 0.00001). Additionally, rTMS significantly improved the FMA, MBI scores and shoulder ROM.
CONCLUSION
rTMS appears to be a promising intervention for reducing PSSP and enhancing upper-limb motor function. These findings support incorporating rTMS into stroke rehabilitation protocols. In the future, high-quality, multi-center RCTs with extended follow-up are warranted to optimize stimulation parameters and validate long-term benefits.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.