MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.947

Медицинская библиотека · Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2013

Is axillary dissection necessary for breast cancer in old women? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Zhang Pei-Zhen, Chong Le, Zhao Ye, Gu Jing, Tian Jin-Hui, Yang Ke-Hu

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We performed this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of axillary dissection in old women.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched and all randomized controlled trials of axillary dissection in old women (at least 60 years old) were considered. Meta-analyses were completed using RevMan5.1.

RESULTS

Three eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 5,337 patients were considered. There was weak evidence in favour of axillary dissection (AD) in old women. The meta-analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) after 1, 3, 5 and 7 years and the disease free survival (DFS) after 1, 3 and 5 year were not statistically significantly different between AD and no AD groups. However, there was a difference in the 7 year DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary dissection did not provide survival benefit to the old women with breast cancer analysed. Therefore, axillary dissection is not well-indicated in old women with breast cancer.

Для цитирования: Zhang Pei-Zhen, Chong Le, Zhao Ye, Gu Jing, Tian Jin-Hui, Yang Ke-Hu. Is axillary dissection necessary for breast cancer in old women? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2013. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.947.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.