Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2002
Revision stapedectomy in Israel.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berenholz Leonard, Lippy William, Harell Moshe
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the audiometric results and surgical findings of revision stapedectomy in Israel.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING Tertiary referral center and private otology practice.
PATIENTS: Seventy-eight patients over 13 years.
RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were evaluated during a mean follow-up time of 1.5 years. Ten patients with far advanced otosclerosis or dizziness were then excluded. Closure of air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved in 67.6% of patients. Pure tone average (PTA, 500-4,000 Hz) improvement in hearing was 22.5 dB. Operative findings at time of revision were prosthesis malfunction (42.6%), incus necrosis (22%), incomplete stapedectomy (11.8%), and fistula (l.5%). Sensorineural hearing loss occurred in one patient. The technique of revision involved regrafting the oval window and the use of a piston prosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical findings and results in this study are similar to those in other large studies. Although success was less than in primary stapedectomy, the results justified revisions. Hearing gains were dependent on surgical findings, the number of previous revisions, and associated ossicular problems.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING Tertiary referral center and private otology practice.
PATIENTS: Seventy-eight patients over 13 years.
RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were evaluated during a mean follow-up time of 1.5 years. Ten patients with far advanced otosclerosis or dizziness were then excluded. Closure of air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved in 67.6% of patients. Pure tone average (PTA, 500-4,000 Hz) improvement in hearing was 22.5 dB. Operative findings at time of revision were prosthesis malfunction (42.6%), incus necrosis (22%), incomplete stapedectomy (11.8%), and fistula (l.5%). Sensorineural hearing loss occurred in one patient. The technique of revision involved regrafting the oval window and the use of a piston prosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical findings and results in this study are similar to those in other large studies. Although success was less than in primary stapedectomy, the results justified revisions. Hearing gains were dependent on surgical findings, the number of previous revisions, and associated ossicular problems.