MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00296.x

Медицинская библиотека · Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 1995

Colloid bismuth versus famotidine in the treatment and prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse: results of a double-blind, double dummy randomized study.

Masci E, Colombo E, Testoni P A, Fanti L, Guslandi M, Tittobello A

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Fifty-three consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer (DU) were randomly included in a double-blind, double-dummy study to test the healing and relapsing rate of two treatment regimens: famotidine 40 mg nocte for 4-8 weeks, followed by 20 mg for 12 months after healing of the ulcer and colloidal bismuth (CBS) (240 mg bid) for 4-8 weeks, followed by placebo maintenance treatment. The results of the short term period confirmed the efficacy of CBS in healing DU (24/25 in CBS group and 19/23 in famotidine group). However, the relapse rate in the CBS-treated group was higher (77.8% at 12 months) than in the famotidine group (35.7%) (p = 0.041). Only 7 patients (41.2%) were cleared from Helicobacter pylori (HP) after CBS treatment. In conclusion, the high relapse rate observed in CBS treated patients may be related to the high percentage of patients with HP infection in the tested group and support the hypothesis that lack of efficacy of CBS in preventing DU recurrence is related to its poor eradication of HP.

Для цитирования: Masci E, Colombo E, Testoni P A, Fanti L, Guslandi M, Tittobello A. Colloid bismuth versus famotidine in the treatment and prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse: results of a double-blind, double dummy randomized study.. Fundamental & clinical pharmacology. 1995. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00296.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.