m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026

Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation at rest is associated with multiple functional vulnerabilities during exercise stress echocardiography.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Zagatina Angela, Ciampi Quirino, Boshchenko Alla, Rodriguez-Zanella Hugo, Padang Ratnasari, Bursi Francesca, D'Alfonso Maria Grazia, Arbucci Rosina, Saad Ariel, Shmatov Dmitry, Kalinina Elena, Zhuravleva Olga, Kane Garvan C, Citro Rodolfo, Safarova Ayten, Kasprzak Jaroslaw D, Rigo Fausto, Barral Patricia, Wierzbowska-Drabik Karina, Cortigiani Lauro, Djordjevic-Dikic Ana, Vazquez Jesus Peteiro, Cocchia Rosangela, Ostojic Miodrag, Souto German, Nikolic Aleksandra, Costantino Marco Fabio, Manganelli Fiorenzo, Ryadinskiy Mikhail E, Kovacevic-Preradovic Tamara, Pellikka Patricia A, Picano Eugenio

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of coronary artery disease (CAD), often occurring after myocardial infarction. Even when moderate in severity, IMR is associated with adverse outcomes. AIMS: To compare functional vulnerability and outcomes in patients with different degrees of non-severe IMR. METHODS: This prospective international multicenter study included 126 patients with CAD (94 males; mean age 66 ± 9 years) from 13 institutions. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: Patients with moderate IMR, Group 2: Patients with absent-to-mild IMR. All patients underwent comprehensive exercise stress echocardiography (ESE). RESULTS: Despite similar left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest (I = 47 ± 11% vs. II = 45 ± 11%, p = 0.141) and during stress (I = 47 ± 13% vs. II = 49.0 ± 12.0%, p = 0.525), Group 1 patients showed higher peak wall motion score index (I = 2.29 vs. II = 1.82, p < 0.002), more B-lines(I = 4 vs. II = 2, p < 0.002), reduced heart rate reserve (I = 1.32 vs. II = 1.58, p < 0.0001) and reduced LV contractile reserve (I = 1.11 vs. II = 1.35, p < 0.0005). During a median follow-up of 21 months, the composite endpoint (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure) occurred more frequently in Group 1 (36.2% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.031). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with severe MR during SE compared with the remaining patients (37.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Despite similar resting and stress LVEF, CAD patients with moderate IMR demonstrated a distinct profile of multiple functional vulnerabilities during ESE compared to patients with absent-to-mild IMR.

Предметные рубрики MeSH