Veterinary clinical pathology · 2004
Detection of neoplastic lymphocytes in peripheral blood of dogs with lymphoma by polymerase chain reaction for antigen receptor gene rearrangement.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keller Rachel L, Avery Anne C, Burnett Robert C, Walton Judy A, Olver Christine S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Uniquely rearranged immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene sequences can be amplified and electrophoretically separated by size to detect a clonal population of lymphocytes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detects neoplastic (clonal) lymphocytes more frequently than do microscopic methods.
METHODS: We identified neoplastic lymphocytes in peripheral blood by both routine and standardized microscopic examination of blood smears and by PCR amplification of blood-derived DNA and compared the 3 methods for frequency of detection of leukemic involvement. For standardized microscopic examination (200 leukocytes counted on Wright-Giemsa-stained blood smears), samples were categorized as negative (</=1% prolymphocytes), equivocal (>1% prolymphocytes, no lymphoblasts), or positive (>/=1 lymphoblast). A PCR-amplified sample was positive if 1 or 2 discrete bands were seen on the gel, or negative if no bands, a smear, or a faint ladder was seen.
RESULTS: Using PCR, neoplastic lymphocytes were detected in peripheral blood 2.5 times more frequently than with routine or standardized microscopic evaluation. Eighty-three percent of samples negative by microscopy were positive by PCR.
CONCLUSION: PCR is more sensitive than microscopy for the detection of clonal lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The results of this study also suggest that neoplastic lymphocytes circulate in peripheral blood at a higher frequency than previously reported. PCR may be useful for detecting or phenotyping lymphoma, monitoring response to therapy, identifying recurrence, and screening breeds at risk.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detects neoplastic (clonal) lymphocytes more frequently than do microscopic methods.
METHODS: We identified neoplastic lymphocytes in peripheral blood by both routine and standardized microscopic examination of blood smears and by PCR amplification of blood-derived DNA and compared the 3 methods for frequency of detection of leukemic involvement. For standardized microscopic examination (200 leukocytes counted on Wright-Giemsa-stained blood smears), samples were categorized as negative (</=1% prolymphocytes), equivocal (>1% prolymphocytes, no lymphoblasts), or positive (>/=1 lymphoblast). A PCR-amplified sample was positive if 1 or 2 discrete bands were seen on the gel, or negative if no bands, a smear, or a faint ladder was seen.
RESULTS: Using PCR, neoplastic lymphocytes were detected in peripheral blood 2.5 times more frequently than with routine or standardized microscopic evaluation. Eighty-three percent of samples negative by microscopy were positive by PCR.
CONCLUSION: PCR is more sensitive than microscopy for the detection of clonal lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The results of this study also suggest that neoplastic lymphocytes circulate in peripheral blood at a higher frequency than previously reported. PCR may be useful for detecting or phenotyping lymphoma, monitoring response to therapy, identifying recurrence, and screening breeds at risk.