Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · 2008
An uncommon skin condition illustrates the need for caution when prescribing for friends.
Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ares Ella
Аннотация
PURPOSE: A dual-focused case study written to discuss the legal and medical hazards of informally writing prescriptions for friends or family members and to provide knowledge of early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF), its course, and treatment.
DATA SOURCES: A review of the prescribing practices of clinicians, the cognitive processes needed in diagnosis and treatment, the current ethical guidelines, and a review of MF, its course, and treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating acquaintances and family informally places clinicians at risk for liability and patients at risk for inaccurate diagnosis and treatment. This case illustrates the potential hazard of casually treating a friend for what looks like a benign condition. Resembling atopic dermatitis in its early stages, MF is the most common of a rare group of skin lymphomas. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for a better prognosis. Had this clinician complied with the request of her friend, his diagnosis would have been missed and timely treatment delayed.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: No matter what the prior relationship may have been, once a clinician treats a patient, a legally binding relationship begins, requiring the due standard of care. Nurse practitioners (NPs) need to be aware of the potential for error when treating acquaintances. Available NP standards of practice and ethical guidelines should address informal treatment situations.
DATA SOURCES: A review of the prescribing practices of clinicians, the cognitive processes needed in diagnosis and treatment, the current ethical guidelines, and a review of MF, its course, and treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating acquaintances and family informally places clinicians at risk for liability and patients at risk for inaccurate diagnosis and treatment. This case illustrates the potential hazard of casually treating a friend for what looks like a benign condition. Resembling atopic dermatitis in its early stages, MF is the most common of a rare group of skin lymphomas. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for a better prognosis. Had this clinician complied with the request of her friend, his diagnosis would have been missed and timely treatment delayed.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: No matter what the prior relationship may have been, once a clinician treats a patient, a legally binding relationship begins, requiring the due standard of care. Nurse practitioners (NPs) need to be aware of the potential for error when treating acquaintances. Available NP standards of practice and ethical guidelines should address informal treatment situations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
BiopsyDermatitis, AtopicDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsDrug PrescriptionsEarly DiagnosisFamilyFriendsHumansLiability, LegalMaleMalpracticeMycosis FungoidesNeoplasm StagingNurse PractitionersNursing AssessmentPhysical ExaminationPractice Guidelines as TopicProfessional AutonomyPrognosisRare Diseases