American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2002
Experimental tooth movement through mature and immature bone regenerates after distraction osteogenesis in dogs.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakamoto Norimichi, Nagasaka Hiroshi, Daimaruya Takayoshi, Takahashi Ichiro, Sugawara Junji, Mitani Hideo
Аннотация
The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of tooth movement on tooth roots and periodontal tissues when teeth were moved into mature, well-organized, and mineralized regenerate bone created after distraction osteogenesis compared with immature, fibrous, and less-mineralized bone. Six 15-month-old male beagles underwent 10 mm of bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. After 2-week (group 1) and 12-week (group 2) consolidation periods, third premolars were moved distally into the regenerate bone with 100 g of orthodontic force for 12 weeks. Simultaneously, second premolars were also moved distally as controls. After completion of tooth movement, the experimental animals were killed, and their tissues were harvested for histological evaluation. When premolars in groups 1 and 2 were compared, group 1 showed higher rates of tooth movement until the eighth week of experimental tooth movement (P <.05). The amount of tooth movement was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2 or in the control teeth (P <.05). In group 1, we observed considerable root resorption extending into the dentin, and the thickness of the dentin became approximately half that of the controls at the compression side adjacent to the distraction gap. This root resorption extended from the cementoenamel junction to the root apex. In group 2, root resorption on the compression side reached the dentin, but the root resorption was less than in group 1. These results indicated that heavy force and early orthodontic tooth movement are not recommended when teeth are moved through regenerated bone created by distraction osteogenesis, to avoid tipping and severe root resorption.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Alveolar ProcessAnimalsBasement MembraneBicuspidBone RegenerationBone RemodelingCalcification, PhysiologicDental CementumDentinDogsFibroblastsMaleMandibleMatched-Pair AnalysisMicroradiographyOsteogenesis, DistractionPeriodontal LigamentRoot ResorptionStatistics as TopicStress, MechanicalTime FactorsTooth ApexTooth CervixTooth Movement TechniquesTooth Root