Annals of hematology · 2026
Long-term follow-up of predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in the phase 3 COMMODORE trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Bin, Li Jian, Liu Ligen, Du Xin, Jiang Hao, Hu Jianda, Zeng Xiaoxi, Sakatani Taishi, Kosako Masanori, Deng Yaru, Ivanov Vladimir, Bondarenko Sergey, Lee Lee Lily Wong, Khuhapinant Archrob, Martynova Elena, Hasabou Nahla, An Jamie Jung-Hee, Wang Jianxiang
Аннотация
To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of gilteritinib compared with salvage chemotherapy (SC) in patients with relapsed/refractory FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the phase 3 COMMODORE (NCT03182244) trial, patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML from China, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, and Malaysia were randomized to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or SC. The long-term follow-up included assessments every 3 months for a maximum of 3 years from the end-of-treatment visit. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), complete remission (CR) rate, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) rate, and transfusion maintenance and conversion rates. Overall, 276 patients (gilteritinib, n = 137; SC, n = 139) completed the long-term follow-up. Most (88.0%) patients were Asian. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS was longer with gilteritinib versus SC (10.3 [8.8, 12.7] vs 5.4 [4.1, 8.1] months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI], 0.612 [0.451, 0.832]), with a median follow-up of 34.6 months. The median (95% CI) EFS was longer with gilteritinib versus SC (2.1 [< 0.1, 3.2] vs 0.6 [0.2, 1.2] months, respectively; HR [95% CI], 0.589 [0.438, 0.792]). The CR rate was 20.4% and 11.5% in the gilteritinib and SC arms, respectively. During the entire study period, 22.6% and 7.9% of patients in the gilteritinib and SC arms underwent HSCT, respectively; 18.2% of patients in the gilteritinib arm received on-study HSCT. No new safety concerns were identified. Long-term gilteritinib treatment improved clinical outcomes compared with SC and was well-tolerated in a predominantly Asian population with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML.